Illogicology asked:


You pick it up, look at it and you know it was designed and created by an intelligent creator. It’s obvious, you knew as soon as you looked it.

If everything else in the forest was made by an intelligent creator, why should the watch be significant in this analogy? Shouldn’t this analogy work with a complex, intelligently designed rock in place of a watch?

Why do you think it doesn’t?
or perhaps you think it does work, I’d like to hear from you aswell!
I think people are missing my point somewhat. Someone who believed in evolution wouldn’t say the watch evolved, they WOULD say the trees did. The fact that creationists use this analogy shows they make a distinction between something created and something natural and grown. And yet, they argue that the trees and rocks are as obvious as the watch. Why?

LOURDES