Comments on: Is the Discovery Channel an embarrassment to the Evolutionist? http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/ Walking Through The Mystical Forests Of The World Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:00:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: RickK http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-759 RickK Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:29:09 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-759 "so far every fossil from dinosaur to bird has been disproved" If you have to lie to defend your faith, it must be a really weak faith. “so far every fossil from dinosaur to bird has been disproved”

If you have to lie to defend your faith, it must be a really weak faith.

]]> By: Marc L http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-758 Marc L Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:55:47 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-758 You sir, are an embarrassment to the English language. "whales walk on all fore lags, with no evidence are fossil record just all this imagination made up on DNA myth. " 1) four legs, not fore lags 2) You should end this sentence at "evidence." The rest of it "are fossil record, etc" should be extremely reworded. I have no idea what you're trying to say here. "A great evolutionist once said, If you tell a lie often enough people will begin to believe you, and the bigger the lie the most likely they will believe you, Adolf ******." 1) Adolf ****** was opposed to the Theory of Evolution. 2) It should be: A great evolutionist once said, "If you tell a lie often enough, people will believe you, and the bigger the lie, the more likely they are to believe you."-Adolf Hitler 3) Either way, you've misquoted. See first link for exact quote. "Before you say a word show me your 65 million year old, DNA on these Dinosaurs." 1) Comma after word, but not after old. 2) No capital letter on dinosaurs. You sir, are an embarrassment to the English language.

“whales walk on all fore lags, with no evidence are fossil record just all this imagination made up on DNA myth. ”

1) four legs, not fore lags
2) You should end this sentence at “evidence.” The rest of it “are fossil record, etc” should be extremely reworded. I have no idea what you’re trying to say here.

“A great evolutionist once said, If you tell a lie often enough people will begin to believe you, and the bigger the lie the most likely they will believe you, Adolf ******.”

1) Adolf ****** was opposed to the Theory of Evolution.
2) It should be: A great evolutionist once said, “If you tell a lie often enough, people will believe you, and the bigger the lie, the more likely they are to believe you.”-Adolf Hitler
3) Either way, you’ve misquoted. See first link for exact quote.

“Before you say a word show me your 65 million year old, DNA on these Dinosaurs.”

1) Comma after word, but not after old.
2) No capital letter on dinosaurs.

]]> By: kellowyn http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-757 kellowyn Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:16:31 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-757 The Holocaust was a faith-based initiative. Check your historical facts before spouting off on these random tirades. The Holocaust was a faith-based initiative. Check your historical facts before spouting off on these random tirades.

]]> By: Chronos http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-756 Chronos Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:29:18 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-756 The theory that birds are the descendants of dinosaurs has been around for decades. It was developed and refined due to the similarities of bone structures of some dinosaurs and early birds. In other words through examination of the fossil record which you claim doesn't exist. Your "show me the DNA" argument is a false one because it's unnecessary to showing the linkage. As for your "lie" analogy, lame as it it is, why couldn't that apply to organized religion? The theory that birds are the descendants of dinosaurs has been around for decades. It was developed and refined due to the similarities of bone structures of some dinosaurs and early birds. In other words through examination of the fossil record which you claim doesn’t exist. Your “show me the DNA” argument is a false one because it’s unnecessary to showing the linkage.

As for your “lie” analogy, lame as it it is, why couldn’t that apply to organized religion?

]]> By: numbnuts222 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-755 numbnuts222 Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:20:12 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-755 Actually there's good fossil evidence for the ancestors of whales walking on 4 legs. They've also found proteins from T-Rex bones that match up with chickens. enjoy Actually there’s good fossil evidence for the ancestors of whales walking on 4 legs.

They’ve also found proteins from T-Rex bones that match up with chickens.

enjoy

]]> By: grraartist http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-754 grraartist Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:03:38 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-754 First before I even begin to touch this question I need to let the first individual who tried to answer your question know a simple fact. There are not 60 million biologists in the entire world. I would be greatly surprised if there were over 4 million world wide. Second not all biologists believe evolution is correct. That pretty much sums that up, now on to the question. I myself prefer to do my own research than to take any information from a TV channel that considers reality shows that teach Absolutely nothing except how stupid people can actually be as a serious source for anything. By the way ****** was into eugenics, which teaches Utopian beliefs based on the survival of the fittest, and while some of what he believed was based upon Darwin's theory, ****** himself had a very weak understanding of the theory. ****** was also known to be a spiritualist, and believed in several myths, and tons of superstitions. One other thing , although he was baptized as a Roman Catholic, Hiltler was not a practicing Catholic. Saying that does not in any way mean that i believe the theory of evolution to be correct or that I support ****** or his ideals. He was a monster and his ethos for a master race was unethical at best and vile at it's worst. First before I even begin to touch this question I need to let the first individual who tried to answer your question know a simple fact. There are not 60 million biologists in the entire world. I would be greatly surprised if there were over 4 million world wide. Second not all biologists believe evolution is correct. That pretty much sums that up, now on to the question. I myself prefer to do my own research than to take any information from a TV channel that considers reality shows that teach Absolutely nothing except how stupid people can actually be as a serious source for anything. By the way ****** was into eugenics, which teaches Utopian beliefs based on the survival of the fittest, and while some of what he believed was based upon Darwin’s theory, ****** himself had a very weak understanding of the theory. ****** was also known to be a spiritualist, and believed in several myths, and tons of superstitions. One other thing , although he was baptized as a Roman Catholic, Hiltler was not a practicing Catholic. Saying that does not in any way mean that i believe the theory of evolution to be correct or that I support ****** or his ideals. He was a monster and his ethos for a master race was unethical at best and vile at it’s worst.

]]> By: Dendronbat Crocoduck http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-753 Dendronbat Crocoduck Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:37:23 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-753 There are dozen of fossils showing the evolution of maniraptoran dinosaurs to transitional enantiornithians to ornithurians to neornithians (birds). These transitional forms have not been "disproven." Find any REPUTABLE source on paleontology and study it. We further have absolute forensic evidence of the dinosaur ancestry of birds from molecular genetics. Studies have even been done reverse engineering deactivated genes in bird genomes to grow dinosaur teeth or dinosaur tails. The nucleobase replacement of genes underlying the organizing of cells from scales to feather is understood and we can reverse engineer that as well. People like you, who rely on ignorance and lies about science, are an embarassment to religion. You do far more harm than good to the religion you purport to help. There are dozen of fossils showing the evolution of maniraptoran dinosaurs to transitional enantiornithians to ornithurians to neornithians (birds). These transitional forms have not been “disproven.” Find any REPUTABLE source on paleontology and study it.

We further have absolute forensic evidence of the dinosaur ancestry of birds from molecular genetics. Studies have even been done reverse engineering deactivated genes in bird genomes to grow dinosaur teeth or dinosaur tails. The nucleobase replacement of genes underlying the organizing of cells from scales to feather is understood and we can reverse engineer that as well.

People like you, who rely on ignorance and lies about science, are an embarassment to religion. You do far more harm than good to the religion you purport to help.

]]> By: tigris http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-752 tigris Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:03:25 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-752 Don't know how good the discovery channel is as I don't watch television. I do know that this post should be an embarrassment for you. It really beats me why some people insist to post stuff which basically screams "I am dumb" like you do. Maybe you can explain us your qualification in biology? Don’t know how good the discovery channel is as I don’t watch television.
I do know that this post should be an embarrassment for you.

It really beats me why some people insist to post stuff which basically screams “I am dumb” like you do. Maybe you can explain us your qualification in biology?

]]> By: kεlsεy ॐ http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-751 kεlsεy ॐ Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:47:57 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-751 There's evidence that supports birds evolved from dinosaurs. Whales HAVE hind leg bones still, that's why scientists think they once walked. I don't have any DNA evidence on me, but I'm studying to be an anthropologist. Give me a few years and maybe I'll send you a chip of a bone from an autralopithecus afarensis (one of our ancestors). There’s evidence that supports birds evolved from dinosaurs. Whales HAVE hind leg bones still, that’s why scientists think they once walked.

I don’t have any DNA evidence on me, but I’m studying to be an anthropologist. Give me a few years and maybe I’ll send you a chip of a bone from an autralopithecus afarensis (one of our ancestors).

]]> By: melouofs http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/comment-page-1/#comment-750 melouofs Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:37:44 +0000 http://www.mysticalforest.co.uk/is-the-discovery-channel-an-embarrassment-to-the-evolutionist/#comment-750 I'm sorry to yell you this, but your "question" doesn't read well. I'm sure you have it all worked out in your own mind, but please reread your post and restate exactly what you are asking? Are you asking whether turkeys are descendents of dinosaurs? Are you asking whether there is DNA of dinasaurs? Are you talking turkey or Discovery Channel? I'm sorry, but I do know how to read, but I am simply unable to follow you here. I’m sorry to yell you this, but your “question” doesn’t read well. I’m sure you have it all worked out in your own mind, but please reread your post and restate exactly what you are asking?

Are you asking whether turkeys are descendents of dinosaurs? Are you asking whether there is DNA of dinasaurs? Are you talking turkey or Discovery Channel? I’m sorry, but I do know how to read, but I am simply unable to follow you here.

]]>